Eastern Christian Theology of Marriage as Sacrament: What the Church Fathers Teach
Eastern Christian Theology • Patristic Teaching • Holy Matrimony
The Eastern Christian Theology of Marriage as Sacrament: What the Church Fathers Teach About Holy Matrimony
From St. John Chrysostom to the crowning ceremony, Eastern Christianity holds a theology of marriage that the Western world has largely forgotten — one in which the home is a church, love is liturgy, and the covenant between husband and wife is a living icon of Christ's love for His Bride.
At a Glance
- The Sacrament
- Holy Matrimony — one of the seven sacraments in Eastern Christianity, called the "crowning" after its central rite
- Primary Patristic Voice
- St. John Chrysostom (349–407), whose Homilies on Ephesians remain the foundational Eastern theology of Christian marriage
- Central Scripture
- Ephesians 5:25 — "Husbands, love your wives as Christ loved the Church and gave Himself up for her"
- Key Concept
- The "domestic church" — the Christian household as a living extension of the Church, ordered toward holiness and God
- Traditions Covered
- Eastern Orthodox, Byzantine Catholic, Maronite Catholic, Coptic, Armenian, and the broader Eastern Christian family
- The Patristic Vision
- Marriage as theosis — the spouses sanctifying each other and together moving toward union with God
When Western Christians speak of marriage, they tend to speak of it as a relationship — a covenant between two people that, at its best, reflects the love of God. That is true as far as it goes. But Eastern Christianity goes much further. In the theological tradition that runs from the Desert Fathers through St. John Chrysostom, through the Byzantine liturgy and into the living practice of Orthodox and Eastern Catholic parishes today, marriage is not merely a relationship that reflects God. It is a sacrament — a divine mystery in which God Himself acts, a liturgy performed not in church buildings alone but in every kitchen and bedroom and dining table of every Christian home.
The Eastern theology of marriage is among the most beautiful and demanding in all of Christian thought. It is also among the least known in the wider English-speaking world. Most of what has been written on Christian marriage in recent decades draws on Western sources — on Augustine's theology of the goods of marriage, on Protestant Reformation frameworks, on modern evangelical approaches to Ephesians 5. The Eastern patristic tradition — Chrysostom's homilies on marriage and the family, the Syriac bridal mysticism of St. Ephrem, the concept of the domestic church, the theology embedded in the crowning ceremony — remains largely untranslated in people's actual marriages.
This article is a comprehensive guide to that tradition: what the Church Fathers actually taught about marriage, what the Eastern liturgical rites reveal about its meaning, and how this ancient theology addresses the deepest questions about what Christian marriage is for. For those who want to take this theology from the page into daily life, The Sacred Mirror: A Theology of Marriage as a Sacrament is the most accessible modern book written entirely in the language of this tradition — grounded in the Church Fathers, fluent in Eastern sacramental theology, and designed for couples who want to live what the Fathers taught.
Marriage as Divine Mystery in the East
The Greek word the Eastern Church uses for sacrament is mysterion — mystery. Not mystery in the sense of something confusing or unexplained, but mystery in the Pauline sense: a divine reality hidden within visible form, disclosed to those with eyes to see. When St. Paul calls the marriage of husband and wife a "great mystery" in Ephesians 5:32, he is not being poetic. He is identifying the covenant of marriage as one of the primary places in creation where the invisible love of God becomes visible in human form.
This is the starting point of all Eastern theology of marriage, and it is what distinguishes it from most modern discussions of the topic. Marriage, in the Eastern understanding, is not primarily about happiness, compatibility, or even love in the contemporary therapeutic sense. It is about revelation — the disclosure, through the concrete daily reality of two people living together in covenantal love, of something true about the nature of God Himself.
The Eastern tradition identifies three dimensions of this mystery that Western theology has often underemphasized. First, marriage is iconic — it is a living icon, an image that makes present what it depicts. When the Eastern Church speaks of a couple as an icon of Christ and the Church, it does not mean a decorative symbol. It means that in their actual life together — in their patience, their forgiveness, their service, their fidelity — the love of Christ for His Bride is genuinely made present in the world. Second, marriage is theotic — it is ordered toward theosis, the Eastern Christian concept of union with God. The spouses are not merely companions on the journey; they are the primary means by which God sanctifies each other. Third, marriage is eschatological — it points forward to the marriage of the Lamb, the eternal union of Christ and His Church at the end of all things. Every earthly marriage is, in the Eastern view, a foretaste and a prophecy of that final reality.
This framework has practical consequences that Eastern Christians have inhabited for centuries. If marriage is a mystery — a sacrament in which God acts — then it cannot be maintained by human effort alone. It requires grace, which means it requires prayer, the sacramental life of the Church, and a daily orientation of the married couple toward God as the source and sustainer of their love. The Eastern tradition has always understood that a marriage cut off from this sacramental nourishment will eventually exhaust itself on its own resources — not because the people involved are failures, but because human love alone was never designed to carry the weight that divine love was meant to bear.
Part II
St. John Chrysostom: The Golden-Mouthed on Marriage
No figure in the Eastern Christian tradition has written more extensively or more beautifully about Christian marriage than St. John Chrysostom — the Archbishop of Constantinople whose nickname, "Golden-Mouthed," was given to him by his own congregation for the quality of his preaching. His Homilies on Ephesians, delivered in Antioch in the late 4th century, contain the most systematic Eastern theology of marriage available in the patristic corpus. They remain essential reading for anyone who wants to understand what the Eastern tradition actually teaches.
Chrysostom's theology of marriage centers on a single claim that he develops from multiple angles across multiple homilies: the love of husband and wife is not merely analogous to the love of Christ for the Church. It is a participation in it. When a husband loves his wife as Christ loved the Church — sacrificially, without condition, seeking her holiness before his own comfort — he is not imitating something from the outside. He is being drawn into a divine pattern of love that precedes and enables his own.
"They Image God Himself"
Chrysostom's most quoted statement on marriage is his observation that when husband and wife live in harmony, "they image God Himself." This is a remarkable claim, and it is worth pausing on what he means by it. In Eastern Christian theology, to "image God" is not a metaphor for being like God in some general moral sense. It is to make the invisible God visible — to be an icon, a window through which the divine nature is genuinely disclosed. Chrysostom is saying that a Christian marriage lived in genuine mutual love is one of the places in creation where God becomes visible to the world. The couple's unity becomes a proclamation — not through words or arguments, but through the sheer reality of what their life together is.
This is simultaneously one of the most encouraging and most demanding statements in the entire tradition. Encouraging, because it means that the ordinary daily life of a faithful Christian marriage — the patience, the forgiveness, the service, the fidelity maintained through difficulty — is not a small thing. It is a form of theology, a visible argument for the reality of God. Demanding, because it means the standard against which Christian marriage is measured is not cultural convention or reasonable expectation but the love of Christ for His Bride: a love that is total, unconditional, and ultimately self-sacrificial.
Chrysostom on Ephesians 5:25
In Homily 20 on Ephesians, Chrysostom develops his reading of the command "Husbands, love your wives as Christ loved the Church" with remarkable precision. He is clear that this is not a command to dominate or control. The husband's "headship" in marriage, he insists, is the headship of service — modeled on Christ's headship, which expressed itself in washing feet and dying on a cross. The husband who understands this verse correctly understands that he has been given the most demanding possible vocation: to love his wife the way God loves humanity — not because she deserves it, not when it is convenient, not when it produces the results he hopes for, but always and without condition, because that is what the love this verse describes actually is.
Chrysostom's practical instruction to husbands is famous for its specificity. He does not speak in abstractions. He tells husbands to praise their wives often and sincerely. To prefer their company. To speak kindly, especially in private. To remember that the wife is a partner and companion, not a servant. And he grounds every one of these practical instructions in the same theological foundation: you are learning to love as Christ loves. Every act of kindness is a small participation in something infinite.
On the imaging of God: "When husband and wife are united in marriage, they no longer seem like something earthly, but rather like the image of God Himself."
On the husband's call: "Love her as Christ loves the Church. Even if it becomes necessary for thee to give thy life for her, yea, and to be cut to pieces ten thousand times — refuse not."
On the domestic church: "Make your home a church. Let the husband be as the head of the body, and the wife as its soul. Let there be nothing that does not tend toward God."
On daily practice: "Let there be prayer in the morning, in the evening, before eating, before sleeping. Let the name of Christ be the first word on your lips each day."
What makes Chrysostom's theology particularly valuable for Eastern Christians today is that it was written for ordinary people in ordinary circumstances. His homilies on Ephesians were preached not to monks or theologians but to the merchants and tradespeople and families of Antioch — people with busy lives, financial pressures, and difficult relationships. His theology of marriage was not meant for ideal conditions. It was meant for exactly the conditions in which most people actually live their marriages.
St. Ephrem the Syrian and the Bridal Mysticism of the Syriac Tradition
While Chrysostom provides the most systematic Eastern theology of marriage, it is St. Ephrem the Syrian who contributes its most distinctive poetic and mystical dimension. Ephrem — called "the Harp of the Holy Spirit" and the greatest poet of the patristic era — developed what scholars call bridal mysticism: a theology in which the soul's relationship to God and the married couple's relationship to each other are understood through the rich imagery of the Hebrew Song of Songs and the New Testament figure of the Bride and Bridegroom.
For Ephrem, the marriage of husband and wife is not merely a human institution blessed by God. It is a participation in the primordial love story that runs through all of Scripture — the love of God for His people, the love of Christ for His Church, the love that will find its ultimate expression in the eternal marriage feast of the Lamb. Human marriage, in this view, is embedded in a cosmic narrative of love and longing that gives it a depth and dignity that no secular account of marriage can approach.
Ephrem's contribution to the theology of marriage is not primarily doctrinal but devotional — he teaches Christians how to feel the sacramental weight of their marriage, not only how to think about it. His hymns on the Church as Bride include imagery that applies equally to the human bride and groom: the beloved who is sought, found, and crowned; the love that is worth every sacrifice; the joy that has an eschatological dimension, pointing beyond itself to the joy of the Kingdom. This is why Eastern weddings have, in many traditions, retained a celebratory quality that strikes Western observers as unexpected — not despite the solemnity of the occasion but because of it. If the wedding participates in the marriage feast of the Lamb, then joy is not an addition to the sacrament. It is part of its content.
The Maronite Catholic Church — the Syriac tradition rooted in the spirituality of St. Maron and the Antiochene heritage — inherits Ephrem's bridal mysticism directly. The Maronite wedding liturgy retains ancient Syriac elements that other traditions have lost: poetic blessings over the couple drawn from the Song of Songs, the explicit framing of the wedding as a participation in the eschatological banquet, and a deep awareness that the joy of the occasion is not merely human but divine. If you attend or belong to a Maronite parish, the theology described in this section is not a historical curiosity — it is the living theology your liturgy enacts every time a wedding is celebrated.
Part IV
The Domestic Church: Your Home Is a Sanctuary
One of the most powerful and practically neglected concepts in Eastern Christian theology is the domestic church — the understanding that the Christian household is not merely a place where people who happen to be Christians live together. It is a small ecclesial community, an expression of the Church in miniature, ordered toward the same end as the Church at large: the worship of God and the sanctification of its members.
The term comes directly from Scripture — St. Paul greets "the church that is in your house" (Romans 16:5, Colossians 4:15, Philemon 1:2) — but it is Chrysostom who develops it most fully as a theological concept. In his homilies, he instructs married couples to "make your home a church." He does not mean this metaphorically. He means that the Christian household should have the structure, the rhythm, and the orientation of a church: prayer at set times, Scripture read aloud, the poor welcomed, the needy served, and the love of God expressed in the daily conduct of the people who live there.
The Spouses as Priests of the Household
In Eastern theology, the concept of the domestic church carries with it a specific understanding of the roles of husband and wife. They are described by the Fathers as the "priests" of the household — not in the sacramental sense reserved for ordained clergy, but in the sense of being the ones responsible for offering the life of the household to God. The husband and wife together constitute what the Byzantine tradition calls the "little church" — the primary community of faith in which children first encounter God, in which the rhythms of fasting and prayer and celebration are first learned, and in which the love of God is first experienced in tangible human form.
This is a high calling, and the Eastern tradition has always been realistic about its difficulty. Chrysostom does not describe an idealized domestic church inhabited by perfect people. He describes real households — with financial pressures, difficult in-laws, children who misbehave, and spouses who fail each other — and insists that even in these conditions, the calling remains. Perhaps especially in these conditions. Because the sacramental grace of marriage is not given only for the easy moments. It is given precisely for the moments when human love reaches its limit and needs something beyond itself to continue.
Practical Marks of the Domestic Church
The Eastern tradition identifies several concrete practices that distinguish a household that is genuinely living as a domestic church. Morning and evening prayer together — even brief — is considered essential: the household that begins and ends its day with God is structuring its time around the reality that God is the center of its life, not its schedule. The prayer corner (the krasny ugol in the Russian tradition, the icon corner present in virtually every Eastern Christian home) is the physical sign of this orientation: a place in the home set apart for God, where the family gathers for prayer and the icons make visible the communion of saints surrounding the household. Fasting observed together — the Lenten and Wednesday and Friday fasts of the Eastern tradition — is another mark: the household that fasts together is practicing, in bodily form, that its life is not simply about physical satisfaction but about something more.
None of these practices are complicated. All of them require intention — the daily decision to structure the household around God rather than around convenience. Which is, of course, exactly what the tradition has always said: the domestic church is not built by grand gestures. It is built by the accumulated weight of small, faithful, ordinary choices made day after day in the direction of God.
Part V
The Crowning Ceremony: What the Eastern Wedding Rite Teaches
The Eastern Christian wedding service — called the crowning after its central rite — is one of the most theologically dense liturgical texts in the entire Christian tradition. Every gesture, every prayer, every symbol in the service is a compressed theological statement about what marriage is. To understand the crowning is to understand what the Eastern Church believes about marriage at its deepest level.
The Betrothal Service
The Eastern marriage rite traditionally begins with a separate betrothal service, in which the couple exchanges rings as a sign of their covenant pledge. In many traditions this was performed at the entrance of the church — at the threshold — as a sign that the couple is about to enter a new stage of their journey toward God. The priest blesses the rings and places them on the fingers of the bride and groom three times each, in honor of the Trinity — the first of many Trinitarian signs in the service, reflecting the Eastern conviction that Christian marriage is not a human transaction but a participation in the divine life of the Trinity.
The Crowning
The central rite of the service is the placing of crowns on the heads of the bride and groom. In the Byzantine tradition these are often elaborate metal crowns; in some Syriac and Coptic traditions, crowns of flowers or olive branches. The priest places the crowns on the couple's heads and pronounces: "The servant of God [Name] is crowned unto the handmaid of God [Name], in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit." The crowns carry at least three layers of theological meaning.
First, the crowns are royal: the couple is crowned as king and queen of a domestic kingdom — their household — which they are called to govern not by power but by love, in the image of Christ's own kingship. Second, the crowns are martyr's crowns: in the Byzantine liturgical tradition, the word for crown (stephanos) is the same word used for the crowns of the martyrs. Marriage is being identified as a form of martyrdom — not in the dramatic sense, but in the sense that the Greek word martyria carries: witness. The couple bears witness, through the daily dying-to-self that faithful marriage requires, to the love of Christ who died for His Bride. Third, the crowns are eschatological: they anticipate the crowns of glory that the righteous will wear in the Kingdom. The Eastern wedding service is not merely celebrating the present moment. It is orienting the couple toward their eternal destination.
The Common Cup
Following the crowning, the couple drinks three times from a common cup of wine — a gesture with deep Scriptural resonance. The shared cup recalls the wedding at Cana, where Christ's presence transformed water into wine and sanctified human celebration. It recalls the cup of Gethsemane, where Christ drank the cup the Father gave Him — a reminder that the couple is committing to share not only joy but suffering, not only celebration but sacrifice. And it recalls the Eucharistic cup: the couple's shared life is being placed in the context of the covenant sealed in Christ's own Blood.
The Dance of Isaiah
The service concludes with the couple and priest processing three times around the altar or around a table bearing the Gospel and Cross — the "Dance of Isaiah," so named because the choir sings the troparion "Rejoice, O Isaiah" during the procession. This circular dance around the center of the Church's life (the altar, the Gospel, the Cross) is the liturgical enactment of what the couple is committing to: their marriage will orbit not around themselves but around Christ. Every important decision, every moment of difficulty, every celebration — all of it will be made in relation to the center around which they are now, publicly and liturgically, choosing to walk.
The crowning service is not only a beautiful ceremony. It is a theological curriculum compressed into liturgical form. Every Eastern Christian couple who has been crowned carries, in that rite, a complete theology of what their marriage is for: royal service, faithful witness, shared sacrifice, Eucharistic covenant, and a daily orbit around Christ rather than around themselves. The practical challenge of a Christian marriage is simply this: to live, on an ordinary Tuesday, what the crowning service declared on the day of the wedding.
Part VI
Ephesians 5:25 Through Eastern Eyes
No verse in Scripture has been more formative for Eastern Christian marriage theology than Ephesians 5:25: "Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the Church and gave Himself up for her." This is not merely a moral instruction appended to a doctrinal section of Paul's letter. In the Eastern tradition, it is a revelation — one of the places in Scripture where the mystery of what marriage is for is most explicitly disclosed.
The Eastern reading of this verse differs from the common Western reading in two important ways. First, the Eastern tradition focuses on the word "as" — kathos in the Greek. This is not a word of comparison. It is a word of participation. Paul is not saying "love your wife in a manner similar to how Christ loves the Church." He is saying that the love a husband brings to his wife is, at its best, a genuine sharing in the love Christ brings to the Church. The couple does not merely imitate divine love from the outside. They are invited into it.
Second, the Eastern tradition takes seriously the full weight of the phrase "gave Himself up for her." Chrysostom emphasizes repeatedly that the standard being set here is not romantic affection or even sustained kindness. It is the Cross. The measure of the husband's love for his wife is Christ's willingness to die for His Bride. This is not a standard any human being can meet by effort alone. It requires grace — the sacramental grace of Holy Matrimony, which the Eastern tradition understands as given precisely for this purpose: to enable the couple to love with a love beyond their natural capacity.
The Eastern tradition also reads the second half of this passage — the instruction to wives to "respect" and submit to their husbands — with a specific theological logic that is often misunderstood. The wife's response to her husband is not subordination in a worldly sense. It is the response of the Church to Christ: the loving, free, and grateful response of one who has been genuinely loved and who chooses to honor that love in return. In the Eastern understanding, this is not a statement of inferiority but of sacred reciprocity — the completing of a divine pattern in which both parties are fully themselves and fully oriented toward the other.
What the Eastern tradition makes unmistakably clear is that neither half of this passage can be extracted from its Christological context. A husband cannot claim authority without first claiming the obligation to lay down his life. A wife cannot be asked for submission to anything other than the Christlike love that earns it. Ephesians 5 is a single, unified vision of covenantal love — both parts intelligible only in relation to each other and to Christ.
Part VII
What the Other Church Fathers Teach About Marriage
Beyond Chrysostom and Ephrem, the broader patristic tradition offers a rich chorus of voices on Christian marriage. Here are the most important:
Part VIII
Marriage as the Path to Theosis
To understand Eastern Christian marriage theology fully, one must understand its context within the broader Eastern understanding of what the Christian life is for. The Eastern tradition has a single word for the goal of the Christian life: theosis — deification, union with God. While this term is rare in Western Christian vocabulary, it is central to the Eastern tradition: the life of grace is a life in which the human person becomes, by God's gift and human cooperation, an increasingly transparent bearer of the divine life. "God became man," Athanasius of Alexandria wrote, "so that man might become God" — not by nature but by grace, participation, and transformation.
Marriage, in the Eastern tradition, is one of the primary paths of theosis available to the majority of Christians. The married couple does not pursue God despite their marriage. They pursue God through their marriage — through the daily discipline of loving someone they did not choose to have as a sinner, someone whose specific weaknesses and failures press precisely on their own specific weaknesses and failures. This is not a coincidence in the Eastern view. It is providential design. God gives each spouse precisely the partner whose specific challenges will most effectively purify and sanctify them, if they receive those challenges as invitations to grace rather than occasions for resentment.
The Holy Spirit as the Bond of Marriage
Eastern theology identifies the Holy Spirit as the unseen third partner of every Christian marriage — the divine Person who seals the covenant at its beginning, sustains it through its difficulties, and sanctifies the couple through its ordinary daily demands. This is not metaphorical language. The Eastern tradition understands the Sacrament of Matrimony as a genuine outpouring of the Holy Spirit — comparable in kind, if not in form, to the outpouring at Pentecost. The same Spirit who descended on the apostles as tongues of fire descends on the couple at their crowning, binding them not only to each other but to the divine life that is the ultimate source and sustainer of their love.
The practical implication is significant: when a Christian couple experiences the seasons of difficulty that every marriage eventually encounters — the loss of feeling, the accumulated fatigue, the moments of genuine alienation — the Eastern tradition does not counsel them to try harder or to fall back in love. It counsels them to return to the Spirit who sealed their covenant and ask for the grace that makes possible what human effort cannot sustain. The marriage is not failing. It is being purified. And the Spirit who began the work will complete it, if the couple remains willing to receive what He gives.
Living This Theology Today: From Ancient Teaching to Daily Practice
There is a significant gap, in the lives of most Eastern Christians, between the theology of marriage their tradition teaches and the reality of their daily married life. This is not a criticism. It is simply a fact about the human condition: beautiful and demanding theology does not automatically translate into beautiful and demanding practice. The theology described in this article has been available in the Eastern tradition for sixteen centuries. The question for today's Eastern Christian couple is how to actually inhabit it.
Begin with Naming What Your Marriage Is
The single most practically significant thing the Eastern theology of marriage offers is a reorientation of purpose. Most people enter marriage hoping for happiness, companionship, and love — and these are good things. But the Eastern tradition places them within a larger frame: the purpose of your marriage is the worship of God and the sanctification of you and your spouse. You are not building a comfortable life together. You are building a domestic church. You are becoming icons of divine love for each other and for everyone who encounters your household.
This reorientation changes how difficulty is understood. When a marriage is primarily for happiness, difficulty is a sign that something has gone wrong. When a marriage is primarily for sanctification, difficulty is a sign that something is being worked out. The Eastern tradition has never promised that faithful marriage will be easy. It has promised that faithful marriage will be transformative — that the God who designed marriage for this purpose will provide the grace needed to live it, if the couple remains oriented toward Him.
The Practical Marks of the Eastern Christian Marriage
The tradition identifies several concrete practices that embody its theology. Prayer together — even brief morning and evening prayer — is the most fundamental: it enacts the domestic church by ordering the household's time around God. The icon corner in the home gives that prayer a physical location and a visible reminder of the communion of saints. Observing the fasting seasons together — Lent, the Apostles' Fast, the Dormition Fast, and the Wednesday and Friday fasts of the weekly rhythm — gives the household's relationship to food and pleasure a sacramental dimension. Regular participation in the Eucharist as a couple is perhaps the most important of all: the marriage that receives the Body and Blood of Christ together regularly is being nourished at its root by the same divine love it is called to embody.
None of these practices are burdens. They are, in the tradition's understanding, the ordinary maintenance of an extraordinary grace. The couple that does these things is not earning their marriage's holiness. They are receiving it — creating the conditions in which the sacramental grace of Holy Matrimony can do what it was given to do.
If you are an Eastern Christian couple and you want to begin living this theology more fully, the simplest possible starting point is also, in the tradition's judgment, the most important: pray together tonight before bed. Not a long prayer. Not a perfect prayer. Just a brief, honest acknowledgment together that your marriage belongs to God, that you are asking for His grace, and that you intend to offer it back to Him as an act of worship. That is the domestic church beginning. That is the theology in this article taking its first step into your actual life.
Eastern Christian Prayer Cards for Couples & Families
Handcrafted prayer cards featuring the saints of the Eastern Christian tradition — for personal devotion, icon corners, wedding gifts, and bulk parish orders. The perfect companion to a sacramental marriage.
Browse Prayer Cards →Questions About Eastern Christian Marriage Theology
The Mirror Has Always Been There
The theology described in this article is not new. It has been available in the Eastern Christian tradition for sixteen centuries — in the homilies of Chrysostom, in the hymns of Ephrem, in the rite of the crowning, in the concept of the domestic church. It has shaped the marriages of Eastern Christians across cultures and centuries. It is available to you today.
The question the tradition puts to every married couple is simple: Are you willing to let your marriage be what God designed it to be — not primarily for your happiness, but for His glory and your holiness? If the answer is yes, the grace has been given. The sacrament has been conferred. The crowns have been placed. The task now is to live, one day at a time, into the mystery that was sealed on your wedding day.
The Sacred Mirror: A Theology of Marriage as a Sacrament is the modern guide to living this ancient theology in your daily married life. Written entirely in the language of the Eastern sacramental tradition, it is the next step from this article into the practice it describes.
Get The Sacred Mirror on Amazon →As an Amazon Associate, The Eastern Church earns from qualifying purchases.
